VEHICLEX-43A HYPER-X
MACH9.60
ALT110,000 FT
TSTAG4054 K

Computational Notebooks · Hypersonic Aerodynamics

Two engines.
One shock train.
Zero guesswork.

A from-scratch reconstruction of NASA's X-43A Hyper-X research vehicle — built from published flight-test geometry, driven by real oblique-shock theory and Sutton–Graves heating, run for the two actual flight points that hold the world air-breathing speed record.

3.66mlength
1.52mspan
13°forebody wedge
6.06MW/m²peak nose heating
11.8×inlet pressure rise

01 — Geometry

Reconstructing the airframe
from flight-test data, not guesswork.

Every dimension below traces back to NASA's own published Hyper-X specifications — not an aesthetic approximation. The forebody ramp angles are the actual compression surface that doubled as the scramjet's inlet.

X-43A style hypersonic vehicle geometry, four-panel CFD render showing perspective, planform, profile, and propulsion views Reconstructed lifting-body geometry — perspective / planform / profile / propulsion views
Length12 ft  (3.658 m)
Span5 ft  (1.524 m)
Height2.2 ft  (0.671 m)
Mass~1,300 kg
Forebody ramps4.5° / 5.5° / 3.0°
Nose radius≈ 5.5 mm
Tail surfacesTwin all-movable, 20° cant
PropulsionAirframe-integrated H₂ scramjet

02 — Flow Physics

The forebody is the engine.

Three compression ramps fold the freestream down to engine-face conditions through a chain of oblique shocks — solved here with the real θ–β–M relations, not a lookup table. Drag the toggle to compare both recorded flights.

Surface temperature and propulsion CFD render of the hypersonic vehicle across multiple viewing angles
Surface temperature field — nose stagnation through aftbody expansion
Sutton–Graves stagnation heating
M7
2.98 MW/m²
M10
6.06 MW/m²

Roughly double the heat load at Mach 10 — matching NASA's own assessment of why the third vehicle needed upgraded carbon–carbon leading edges.

03 — Companion Notebook

What happens after combustion:
the supersonic nozzle.

The inlet compresses; the nozzle expands. A second notebook walks through method-of-characteristics and quasi-1D nozzle design for the expansion side of a scramjet cycle — sizing the diverging section that turns combustion-chamber pressure back into thrust.

Quasi-1D isentropic relations size the area ratio for a target exit Mach number; method-of-characteristics then contours the wall to deliver shock-free, uniform exit flow — the same logic that shapes the X-43A's aftbody into an external nozzle.

Open Supersonic Nozzle Design →

Run the analysis yourself

Both notebooks. Zero setup.

Opens directly in Google Colab. Outputs save to /content/output_data/.